The Indian motorcycle landscape has witnessed a new battle brewing. Two distinct contenders, the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and the TVS Ronin, have set their sights on the hearts of modern riders. Both motorcycles cater to a similar segment – a blend of affordability, style, and everyday usability. But beneath the surface, they possess unique characteristics that might sway your decision. This comprehensive comparison delves into the key aspects of the Hunter 350 and the Ronin, making it easier for you to choose the perfect companion for your two-wheeled adventures.
Engine and Performance
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 boasts a larger engine, a 349.34cc single-cylinder unit that churns out 20.4 PS of power and 27 Nm of torque. This engine is known for its relaxed, low-end grunt, perfect for cruising and navigating city streets. The TVS Ronin, on the other hand, takes a different approach. It employs a smaller, 225.9cc single-cylinder engine that delivers the same 20.4 PS of power but with a slightly lower torque figure of 19.93 Nm. This translates to a more sprightly and rev-happy character, ideal for those who prefer a zippier ride.
Weight and Handling
The weight difference between the two motorcycles is a significant factor to consider. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 tips the scales at 177 kg, making it the heavier option. However, Royal Enfield has managed to keep the handling nimble despite the weight. The TVS Ronin, in contrast, is a featherweight at 159 kg. This lighter weight translates to easier maneuverability, especially in tight city traffic or navigating twisty roads.
Features and Technology
When it comes to features, the TVS Ronin takes the lead. It boasts a fully-digital instrument cluster, offering a plethora of information like trip meter, fuel gauge, and gear indicator. The Ronin also comes equipped with Bluetooth connectivity, allowing you to pair your phone and access features like turn-by-turn navigation. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 adopts a more minimalistic approach. It features a semi-digital instrument cluster with an analog speedometer and a digital display for essential information. While it lacks the bells and whistles of the Ronin, the Hunter 350 prioritizes a classic, timeless look.
Fuel Efficiency and Mileage
Fuel efficiency is a crucial aspect for many riders, especially in today’s scenario of rising fuel prices. The TVS Ronin boasts a claimed fuel efficiency of 40.77 kmpl, making it the more frugal option. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 follows closely with a claimed mileage of 36.2 kmpl. While the difference might seem small, it can translate to significant cost savings in the long run, particularly for high-mileage riders.
Price and Value Proposition
Price is often a deciding factor for motorcycle buyers. The TVS Ronin holds a slight edge here, with a starting price of ₹ 1.49 lakh (ex-showroom Delhi). The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 starts at a slightly higher price of ₹ 1.49 lakh (ex-showroom Delhi). However, the Hunter 350 offers a larger engine capacity and the timeless Royal Enfield charm, which might be worth the extra premium for some buyers.
Choosing between the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and the TVS Ronin boils down to your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize a powerful engine, a relaxed riding style, and a classic aesthetic, the Hunter 350 might be your perfect match. However, if you seek a lighter, more agile motorcycle with advanced features and superior fuel efficiency, the TVS Ronin is a compelling option. Ultimately, taking both bikes for a test ride is the best way to determine which one resonates more with your riding style and personality.
Discover more from Wheels Craze - Automotive News, EV News, Car News, Bike News
Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.
